Aspects of correlation of dichotomy “language” and “speech”, “value” and “evaluation”
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-830X-2021-3-2-167-173Mots-clés :
language, speech activity, speech, value, evaluation, evaluative attitudeRésumé
This article deals with the problem of the correlation of two dichotomies “language” and “speech”, “value” and “evaluation”. The authors compare two dichotomies “language” and “speech”, “value” and “evaluation” as phenomena belonging to static and dynamic processes, language, and language activity.
A lot of works such as articles and books of foreign and Russian authors are devoted to the study of the above-mentioned phenomena. Western scholars focused their attention on the philosophically based problem of value, but they paid less attention to the speech expression of evaluation, the latter plays only the formal role.
Our Russian linguists separated the object of research of evaluation in linguistics and philosophy. Not long ago relations of evaluation as a phenomenon were investigated not taking into consideration the concept of value. Traditionally only evaluative speech characteristics of a person, phenomena, things, and living beings were in the focus of attention in linguistics or they were studied in connection with definite models of forming different syntactical constructions.
It is shown that evaluation is always correlated with the value scale typical of this or that language community, and some value orientations are nationally specific. But certainly, some values were always universals and they stay universal ones nowadays.
It is stated that the differentiation between “language” and “speech” can be received by describing the dichotomy “value” and “evaluation”.
Speaking about the theory of language evaluation the study of correlation of mechanisms of speech generation with mechanisms of evaluation as a sum of mechanisms of transferring evaluative attitude to evaluation expressed by speech patterns is the most important problem in this theory.
It is concluded that the correlation of language dichotomy “language” and “speech”, on the one hand, “value” and “evaluation”, on the other hand, is a mirror attitude to each other.
Références
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Анисимов, С. Ф. (2001) Введение в аксиологию. М.: Современные тетради, 128 с.
Арутюнова, Н. Д. (1999) Язык и мир человека. 2-е изд., испр. М.: Языки русской культуры, 896 с.
Балли, Ш. (1955) Общая лингвистика и вопросы французского языка. М.: Изд-во иностранной литературы, 416 с.
Балли, Ш. (1961) Французская стилистика. М.: Изд-во иностранной литературы, 393 с.
Вандриес, Ж. (2001) Язык: лингвистическое введение в историю. 2-е изд., стер. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 408 с.
Вольф, Е. М., Мартынова, Л. Л. (1979) Эксплицитный модус в оценочных структурах. В кн.: Лексическая и грамматическая семантика романских языков: Материалы IV Всесоюзной конференции по романскому языкознанию. Калинин: КГУ, с. 31–40.
Ивин, А. А. (2012) Оценки в процессах коммуникации. Философия науки и техники, т. 17, № 1, с. 203–213.
Медникова, Э. М. (1954) Оценочные прилагательные в современном английском языке. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени кандидата филологических наук. М., МГУ им. М. В. Ломоносова, 14 с.
Федуленкова, Т. Н., Адамия, З. К., Чабашвили, М. (2014) Фразеологическое пространство национального словаря в сопоставительном аспекте. М.: Академия языкознания, 218 с.
REFERENCES
Anisimov, S. F. (2001) Vvedenie v aksiologiyu [Introduction into axiology]. Moscow: Sovremennye tetradi Publ., 128 p. (In Russian)
Arutyunova, N. D. (1999) Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of a human being]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Yazyki russkoj kul’tury Publ., 896 p. (In Russian)
Bally, Ch. (1955) Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury Publ., 416 p. (In Russian)
Bally, Ch. (1961) Traité de stylistique française. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury Publ., 393 p. (In Russian)
Fedulenkova, T. N., Adamiya, Z. K., Chabashvili, M. (2014) Frazeologicheskoe prostranstvo natsional’nogo slovarya v sopostavitel’nom aspekte [The phraseological space of a national vocabulary in the comparative aspect]. Moscow: Akademiya yazykoznaniya Publ., 218 p. (In Russian)
Ivin, A. A. (2012) Otsenki v protsessakh kommunikatsii [Estimation in the process of communication]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki — Philosophy of Science and Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 203–213. (In Russian)
Mednikova, E. M. (1954) Otsenochnye prilagatel’nye v sovremennom anglijskom yazyke [The evaluative adjectives in modern English]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Philology). Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 14 p. (In Russian)
Vendryes, J. (2001) Le langage. Introduction linguistique à l’histoire. 2nd ed., stereotype. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 408 p. (In Russian)
Vol’f, E. M., Martynova, L. L. (1979) Eksplitsitnyj modus v otsenochnykh strukturakh [The explicit modus in the evaluative structures]. In: Leksicheskaya i grammaticheskaya semantika romanskikh yazykov: Materialy IV Vsesoyuznoj konferentsii po romanskomu yazykoznaniyu [Lexical and grammatical semantics of the Romanic languages: Proceedings of the IV All-Soviet Union conference in the Romanic languages]. Kalinin: Kalinin State University Publ., pp. 31–40. (In Russian)
Fichiers supplémentaires
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Igor V. Chekulai, Olga N. Prokhorova 2021
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits an unlimited number of users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use.
This license retains copyright for the authors but allows others to freely distribute, use, and adapt the work, on the mandatory condition that appropriate credit is given. Users must provide a correct link to the original publication in our journal, cite the authors' names, and indicate if any changes were made.
Copyright remains with the authors. The CC BY 4.0 license does not transfer rights to third parties but rather grants users prior permission for use, provided the attribution condition is met. Any use of the work will be governed by the terms of this license.
