Linguocultural characteristics of Julian Barnes’ “The noise of time”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-830X-2020-2-2-81-92Keywords:
biographical texts, biofiction, image of Petersburg, linguocultural analysis, culturonyms, linguoculture, external linguocultural context, J. Barnes, “The noise of time”Abstract
The article examines a number of linguostylistic means which are used in English-language biofictional texts in order to construct the image of Russia, particularly the image of Saint-Petersburg. With the onset of Postmodern Era experimental biographical fiction as a genre has gained a great popularity. The article explores linguocultural characteristics of J. Barnes’ “The noise of time”, the postmodern biography of the outstanding composer D. D. Shostakovich residing in the Soviet Russia.
For the purposes of this study, biofiction is defined as a hybrid literary form that is based on the biography of an actual historical figure. Its semantics reflects the intricate relations between reality and fiction, objectivity and subjectivity. The emergence of biofictional texts is closely connected with the development of the postmodernist philosophy in the second half of the twentieth century. Representing postmodernist discourse quite explicitly, biofictional texts possess such constitutive features as fragmentary narration, various mechanisms of expressing intertextuality, and a montage of various discourse types, ludic modality.
One of the strategies used by biofictional authors for creating verisimilitude in the narration is the construction of external linguocultural context which reflects the actual spatial-temporal relations. The analysis of the elements belonging to external culture is carried out within the framework of interlinguoculturology, on the basis of the methodology, developed by V. V. Kabakchi and combining the linguistic methods of indirect observation and extrapolation. Our research studies the representation of biofictional English-language discourse, describing the Russian culture, by means of English language resources adapted in the course of the so-called “secondary cultural orientation”. The study aims at identifying linguistic markers of Russian cultural text localization, the so called xenonymic Russianisms.
The article provides evidence of such a constitutive characteristic of the narrative text under investigation as the intentional play with facts and fiction. Playing with the semantic correlation between reality and fiction, Barnes skillfully creates an authentic Russian linguocultural context within his English-language biofictional narration. Providing the readers with fact-based descriptions of the Soviet Russia, the English author includes in his text a lot of transliterated borrowings, lexical and semantic calques, proverbs and idioms, Russian literary allusions and quotations from Russian precedent texts. He thoroughly represents Petersburg-Leningrad toponymy. The findings of our research into the representation of external linguocultural context can be relevant to the further study of constitutive characteristics of biofiction as a postmodernist genre as this approach gives a new insight into mechanisms of presenting facts and fiction in the narration.
References
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Андреева, В. А. (2000) Об одной из зон жанровой неопределенности (автобиография и автобиографический роман). Studia Linguistica, № 9, с. 143–150.
Анцыферова, О. Ю. (2018) О нарративе тоталитаризма в творчестве Джулиана Барнса. Вестник Пермского университета. Российская и зарубежная филология, т. 10, № 1, с. 69–78. DOI: 10.17072/2037-6681-2018- 1-69-78
Бахтин, М. М. (2000) Эпос и роман. СПб.: Азбука, 300 с.
Кабакчи, В. В., Белоглазова, Е. В. (2012) Введение в интерлингвокультурологию. СПб.: СПбГУЭФ, 252 с.
Кабакчи, В. В., Белоглазова, Е. В. (2018) Дискурс англоязычного описания русской культуры: перспективы корпусного исследования. Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2: Языкознание, т. 17, № 3, c. 49–59. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.3.5
Киреева, Н. В. (2004) Постмодернизм в зарубежной литературе. М.: Флинта, 214 с.
Лукач, Г. (2015) Исторический роман. M.: Common Place, 178 c.
Мазанова, Е. Ю. (2004) Когнитивные механизмы и языковые средства репрезентации пространства в англоязычном тексте художественной прозы. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени кандидата филологических наук. М., МГЛУ, 24 с.
Теличко, Т. Г. (2017) «Шум» и «музыка» в романе Д. Барнса «Шум времени». Практики и интерпретации: журнал филологических, образовательных и культурных исследований, т. 2, № 4, с. 94–105. DOI: 10.23683/2415-8852-2017-4-94-105
Тимофеева, З. М. (1999) «Ситуативные реалии» в художественном тексте, созданном писателем-билингвом. В кн.: В. В. Болдырев, Т. А. Фесенко (ред.). Реальность, язык и сознание. Межвузовский сборник научных трудов. Т. 1. Тамбов: ТГУ им. Г. Р. Державина, с. 161–162.
Чемодурова, З. М. (2017) Прагматика и семантика игры в англоязычной постмодернистской прозе XX–XXI веков. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени доктора филологических наук. СПб., РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, 40 с.
Чемодурова, З. М. (2019а) Стратегии создания современного англоязычного автобиографического текста. Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена, № 192, с. 52–59.
Чемодурова, З. М. (2019b) Когнитивный диссонанс как компонент интерпретационной программы постмодернистского художественного текста. Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики, № 2, с. 55–64. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-2-55-64
Adams, J. (2016) In new novel, Julian Barnes tests the noise of time through art and biography. The Globe and Mail, 3 June. [Online]. Available at: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/in-new-novel-julian-barnes-tests-the-noise-of-time-through-art-and-biography/article30260780/ (accessed 04.05.2020).
Buisine, A. (1991) Biofictions. Revue des Sciences Humaines. Le Biographique, vol. 4, no. 224, pp. 7–13.
Kendall, P. M. (1965) The art of biography. New York: Norton, 158 p.
Lackey, M. (2017) Introduction to focus: Biofiction — its origins, natures, and evolutions. American Book Review, vol. 39, no. 1, рр. 3–4. DOI: 10.1353/abr.2017.0123
Lackey, M. (2017) Biographical fiction: A reader. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 488 р.
Lasdun, J. (2016) The Noise of Time by Julian Barnes review – how Shostakovich survived Stalin. The Guardian, 22 January. [Online]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jan/22/the-noise-of-time-by-julian-barnes-shostakovich-stalin-review (accessed 01.05.2020).
McHale, B. (1987) Postmodernist fiction. New York: Methuen, 264 p.
Moulin, J. (2015) Biofiction. The Biography Society, 20 December. [Online]. Available at: https://biographysociety. org/2015/12/20/biofiction/ (accessed 28.04.2020).
Stockwell, P. (2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London; New York: Routledge, 193 p.
SOURCES
Barnes, J. (2017) The noise of time. London: Vintage, 183 p. (In English)
REFERENCES
Adams, J. (2016) In new novel, Julian Barnes tests the noise of time through art and biography. The Globe and Mail, 3 June. [Online]. Available at: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/in-new-novel-julian-barnes-tests-the-noise-of-time-through-art-and-biography/article30260780/ (accessed 04.05.2020). (In English)
Andreeva, V. A. (2000) Ob odnoj iz zon zhanrovoi neopredelennosti (avtobiografiya i avtobiograficheskij roman) [About one area of genre ambiguity (autobiography and autobiographical novel)]. Studia Linguistica, no. 9, pp. 143–150. (In Russian)
Antsyferova, O. Yu. (2018) O narrative totalitarizma v tvorchestve Dzhuliana Barnsa [Totalitarian narrative in works of Julian Barnes]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiyskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya — Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–78. DOI: 10.17072/2037-6681-2018-1-69-78 (In Russian)
Bakhtin, M. M. (2000) Epos i roman [Epic and novel]. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka Publ., 300 p. (In Russian)
Buisine, A. (1991) Biofictions. Revue des Sciences Humaines. Le Biographique, vol. 4, no. 224, pp. 7–13. (In French)
Chemodurova, Z. M. (2017) Pragmatika i semantika igry v angloyazychnoj postmodernistskoj proze XX–XXI vekov [Pragmatics and semantics of play in English postmodern prose of 20–21 centuries]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Philology). Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 40 p. (In Russian)
Chemodurova, Z. M. (2019а) Strategii sozdaniya sovremennogo angloyazychnogo avtobiograficheskogo teksta [Strategies of constructing modern autobiographical texts]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena — Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, no. 192, pp. 52–59. (In Russian)
Chemodurova, Z. M. (2019b) Kognitivnyj dissonans kak komponent interpretatsionnoj programmy postmodernistskogo khudozhestvennogo teksta [Cognitive dissonance as a component of the interpretational programme in postmodernist fiction]. Voprosy kognitivnoj lingvistiki — Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 2, pp. 55–64. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2019-2-55-64 (In Russian)
Kabakchi, V. V., Beloglazova, E. V. (2012) Vvedenie v interlingvokul’turologiyu [Introduction to interlinguoculturology]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Economics Publ., 252 p. (In Russian)
Kabakchi, V. V., Beloglazova, E. V. (2018) Discurs angloyazychnogo opisaniya russkoj kul’tury: perspektivi korpusnogo issledovaniya [Russian-culture-oriented discourse of English: Prospects of corpus research]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2, Yazykoznanie — Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 49–59. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.3.5 (In Russian)
Kendall, P. M. (1965) The art of biography. New York: Norton, 158 p. (In English)
Kireeva, N. V. (2004) Postmodernism v zarubezhnoj literature [Postmodernism in foreign literature]. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 214 p. (In Russian)
Lackey, M. (2017) Introduction to focus: Biofiction — Its origins, natures, and evolutions. American Book Review, vol. 39, no. 1, рр. 3–4. DOI: 10.1353/abr.2017.0123 (In English)
Lackey, M. (2017) Biographical fiction: A reader. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 488 р. (In English)
Lasdun, J. (2016) The Noise of Time by Julian Barnes review – how Shostakovich survived Stalin. The Guardian, 22 January. [Online]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jan/22/the-noise-of-time-by-julian-barnes-shostakovich-stalin-review (accessed 01.05.2020). (In English)
Lukács, G. (2015) The historical novel. Moscow: Common Place, 178 p. (In Russian)
Mazanova, Е. Yu. (2004) Kognitivnye mekhanizmy i yazykovye sredstva reprezentatsii prostranstva v angloyazychnom tekste khudozhestvennoj prozy [Cognitive mechanisms and linguistic means of space representation in a literary English text]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Philology). Moscow, Moscow State Linguistic University, 24 p. (In Russian)
McHale, B. (1987) Postmodernist fiction. New York: Methuen, 264 p. (In English)
Moulin, J. (2015) Biofiction. The Biography Society, 20 December. [Online]. Available at: https://biographysociety. org/2015/12/20/biofiction/ (accessed 28.04.2020). (In English)
Stockwell, P. (2002) Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London; New York: Routledge, 193 p. (In English)
Telichko, T. G. (2017) “Shum” i “musyka” v romane D. Barnsa “Shum vremeni” [“Noise” and “music” in Julian Barnes’ novel “The Noise of Time”]. Praktiki i interpretatsii: zhurnal filologicheckikh, obrazovatel’nykh i kul’turnykh issledovanij — Practices and Interpretations: A Journal of Philology, Teaching and Cultural Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 94–105. DOI: 10.23683/2415-8852-2017-4-94-105 (In Russian)
Timofeeva, Z. M. (1999) “Situativnie realii” v khudozhestvennom tekste, sozdannom pisatelem-bilingvom. In: V. V. Boldyrev, T. A. Fesenko (eds.). Realnost’, yazyk i soznanie. Mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Reality, language and consciousness. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers]. Vol. 1. Tambov: Derzhavin Tambov State University, pp. 161–162. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Nadezhda A. Urusova, Zinaida M. Chemodurova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.