Linguistic realization of the category “Alien” in the book of Klaus and Erica Mann “Rundherum”

Authors

  • Irina G. Panevina S. M. Budyonny Military Academy of the Signal Corps

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-830X-2023-5-1-28-37

Keywords:

the opposition “Own-Alien”, the category “Alien”, travel notes, the Soviet Union of the 20s–30s, the category of evaluativity, ethnic stereotypes

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the ways of linguistic realization of the category “Alien” in the book of Klaus and Erica Mann “Around the World” (“Rundherum”), who visited the Soviet Union in 1927. The category “Alien” is considered as a part of the opposition “Own-Alien”, which is one of the cultural dominants of any society. Travel notes are defined as a genre in which the “alien” reality is in the focus of the author’s attention. The relevance of this work is due to a comprehensive approach to the study of this category, taking into account the historical and cultural context of the creation of the book, the social and political situation prevailing at that time in individual countries and the world as a whole. The article discusses the types of linguistic means that contribute to the verbalization of the category “Alien”, describes their functions and place in the text. The opposition “Own-Alien” is presented in close relationship with the category of evaluativity, in this regard, special attention is paid to the group of evaluative vocabulary involved in the implementation of the category under study. The positive and negative aspects noted by German travelers during their stay in the Soviet Union are considered. It is determined that the linguistic realization of the opposition “Own-Alien” turns out to be closely related to existing ethnic stereotypes, although their impact may be offset by the personal position of the author. It is established that the subjective nature of the genre of travel notes has a significant impact on the selection of linguistic means of representation of the “Alien”. The results of the research can be used in the preparation of courses in intercultural communication, linguistics, linguoculturology, a special course in political linguistics.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Алиева, Т. В. (2013) Языковые средства реализации концептуальной оппозиции «свой-чужой» в британском политическом дискурсе. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени кандидата филологических наук. М., МГИМО, 28 с.

Артюков, О. В. (2001) Советско-германские отношения в 1925–1933 гг. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени кандидата исторических наук. М., ИРИ РАН, 37 с.

Бахтин, М. М. (2016) Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. М.: Азбука, 416 с.

Бойко, М. А. (2006) Влияние дискурсивных факторов «свой», «чужой», «другой» на создание в современной прессе позитивного образа страны. В кн.: В. Б. Кашкин (ред.). Язык, коммуникация и социальная среда. Вып. 4. Воронеж: Изд-во ВГУ, с. 139–148.

Болдырев, Н. Н. (2017) Язык как интерпретирующий фактор познания. В кн.: Н. А. Беседина (ред.). Интерпретация мира в языке. Тамбов: Изд-во ТГУ им. Г. Р. Державина, с. 19–81.

Гладкова, О. Х. (2022) Соотношение категорий «оценка» и «свой-чужой» в англоязычных путевых заметках XIX века. Litera, № 5, с. 122–133. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2022.5.35812

Кочетков, В. В. (2017) Психология межкультурных различий. М.: ПЕР СЭ, 416 с.

Strohmeyr, A. (2004) Klaus und Erika Mann. Eine biographie. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag, 180 p.

SOURCES

Mann, E., Mann, K. (2005) Rundherum. Abenteuer einer Weltreise [All the way round: A light-hearted travel book]. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 156 p. (In German)

REFERENCES

Alieva, T. V. (2013) Yazykovye sredstva realizatsii kontseptual’noj oppozitsii “svoj-chuzhoj” v britanskom politicheskom diskurse [Linguistic means of realization of the conceptual opposition “Own-Alien” in the British political discourse]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Philology). Moscow, MGIMO University, 28 p. (In Russian)

Artyukov, O. V. (2001) Sovetsko-germanskie otnosheniya v 1925–1933 gg. [Soviet-German relations in 1925–1933]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (History). Moscow, Institute of Russian History RAS, 37 p. (In Russian)

Bakhtin, M. M. (2016) Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. Moscow: Azbuka Publ., 416 p. (In Russian)

Bojko, M. A. (2006) Vliyanie diskursivnykh faktorov “svoj”, “chuzhoj” i “drugoj” na sozdanie v sovremennoj presse pozitivnogo obraza strany [The influence of discursive factors “Own”, “Alien” and “Other” on the creation of a positive image of the country in the modern press]. In: V. B. Kashkin (ed.). Yazyk, kommunikatsiya i sotsial’naya sreda. Vyp. 4 [Language, communication and social environment. Iss. 4]. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ., pp. 139–148. (In Russian)

Boldyrev, N. N. (2017) Yazyk kak interpretiruyushchij faktor poznaniya [Language as an interpretive factor of cognition]. In: N. A. Besedina (ed.). Interpretatsiya mira v yazyke [Interpretation of the world in language]. Tambov: Derzhavin Tambov State University Publ., pp. 19–81. (In Russian)

Gladkova, O. Kh. (2022) Sootnoshenie kategorij “otsenka” i “svoj-chuzhoj” v angloyazychnykh putevykh zametkakh XIX veka [The ratio of the categories “evaluativity” and “Own-Alien” in English travel notes of the XIX century]. Litera, no. 5, pp. 122–133. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2022.5.35812 (In Russian)

Kochetkov, V. V. (2017) Psikhologiya mezhkul’turnykh razlichij [Psychology of intercultural differences]. Moscow: PER SE Publ., 416 p. (In Russian)

Strohmeyr, A. (2004) Klaus und Erika Mann. Eine biographie [Klaus and Erika Mann. A biography]. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag, 180 p. (In German)

Published

2023-12-11

Issue

Section

Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Research in Language and Discourse