Speech translation vs. Interpreting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-830X-2021-3-2-174-187Keywords:
automatic speech translation, interpreting, artificial intelligence, speech recognitions, MTAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning technologies and big data have impacted on the interpretation market and AI-based technologies can be used in automated speech translation. The first experiments to create an automatic interpreter took place at the end of the 1980s and early 1990s. Today, there are several AI-based devices available on the market which attempt to fully automatize the interpreting process, both in the consecutive and in the simultaneous mode in a limited number of specific communication situations. This article first reviews the history and mechanism of automated interpreting and provides a comparison of human and automated interpreting. It also presents the main features and use cases of automated speech translation (AST). By showing that the two activities are intrinsically different, it argues that they need to be distinguished more clearly by defining the speech-to-speech (S2S) language transfer accomplished by computers as automated speech translation (AST) and keeping the term ‘interpreting’ for the human activity. Automated speech translation has an undeniable role and place in today’s world, steeped in technology and AI. However, it needs to be underlined that it is completely different from the complex interpreting service human interpreters provide and the circumstances and contexts in which its use can be advised is intrinsically different from that of human interpreting. Therefore, the real question is how AST and human interpreting can complement each other, in other words, what are the situations and contexts where AST is desired and applicable and when is there a need for human interpreting?
References
Angelelli, C. V. (2003) The interpersonal role of the interpreter in cross-cultural communication. In: L. Brunette, G. L. Bastin, I. Hemlin, H. Clarke (eds.). The Critical Link 3: Interpreters in the community. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on interpreting in legal, health and social service settings, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, 22–26 May 2001. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ., pp. 15−26. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.46.06ang (In English)
Austermühl, F. (2001) Electronic tools for translators. London: Routledge Publ., 202 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760353 (In English)
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1951) The present state of research on mechanical translation. American Documentation, vol. 2-4, pp. 229–237. (In English)
Besnier, J.-M. (2012) L’homme simplifié: Le syndrome de la touche étoile [The simplified man: The star key syndrome]. Paris: Fayard, 201 p. (In French)
Bird, E., Fox-Skelly, J., Jenner, N. et al. (2020) The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. Brussels: European Union Publ. [Online]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.pdf (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
Bischoff, A., Kurth, E., Henley, A. (2012) Staying in the middle: A qualitative survey of health care interpreters’ perception of their work. Interpreting, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1−22. https://www.doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.1.01bis (In English)
Bot, H. (2003) The myth of the uninvolved interpreter. Interpreting in mental health and the development of three-personpsychology. In: L. Brunette, G. L. Bastin, I. Hemlin, H. Clarke (eds.). The Critical Link 3: Interpreters in the community. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on interpreting in legal, health and social service settings, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, 22–26 May 2001. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ., pp. 27−35. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.46.07bot (In English)
Diriker, E. (2004) De-/Re-contextualizing conference interpreting. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ., 223 p. (In English)
Downie, J. (2020) Interpreters vs Machines. Can interpreters survive in an AI-dominated world? New York: Routledge Publ., 176 p. (In English)
Fantinuoli, C. (2018) Interpreting and technology: The upcoming technological turn. In: C. Fantinuoli (ed.). Interpreting and technology. Berlin: Language Science Press. pp. 1−12. https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1493289 (In English)
Heltai, P. (1999) Minimális fordítás [Minimal translation]. Fordítástudomány — Translation Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 22−33. (In Hungary)
Heltai, P. (2014) Gépi fordítás. Mi az, amit a gép nem tud fordítani? [Machine translation. What can’t machines translate?] In: Szaknyelv és szakfordítás. Tanulmányok a szakfordítás és a fordítóképzés aktuális témáiról [Professional language and translation. Research on current issues of professional translation and translator training]. Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetem Publ., pp. 7−29. [Online]. Available at: http://nyelviintezet.szie.hu/sites/default/files/szie_2014_vegleges_szakfordito.pdf (accessed 04.05.2021). (In Hungary)
Horváth, I. (ed.). (2016) The modern translator and interpreter. Budapest: Eötvös University Press. [Online]. Available at: http://www.eltereader.hu/media/2016/04/HorvathTheModernTranslator.pdf (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
Hutchins, W. J. (1986) Machine translation: Past, present, future. New York: Wiley & Sons Publ., 382 p. (In English)
Jekat, S. J. (2015) Machine interpreting. In: F. Pöchhacker, N. Grbić, P. Mead, R. Setton (eds.). Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London; New York: Routlegde Publ., pp. 239−241. (In English)
Jekat, S. J., Klein, A. (1996) Machine interpretation. Open problems and some solutions. Interpreting, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.1.1.02jek (In English)
Kelly, N., Zetzsche, J. (2012) Found in translation. How language shapes our lives and transforms the world. New York: Penguin Publ., 191 p. (In English)
Koehn, P. (2017) Statistical machine translation. Draft of Chapter 13: Neural machine translation. [Online]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.07809.pdf (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
Laki, L. J. (2018) Mesterséges intelligencia a gépi fordításban [Artificial intelligence in machine translation]. In: Tolcsvai Nagy G. (ed.). A humán tudományok és a gépi intelligencia [Human sciences and machine intelligence]. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó Publ., pp. 156−183. [Online]. Available at: http://real.mtak.hu/88740/1/Tolcsvai-nyomda_156_laki.pdf (accessed 04.05.2021). (In Hungary)
Lance, Ng. (2018) AI Interpreter Fail at China Summit Sparks Debate about Future of Profession. [Online]. Available at: https://slator.com/features/ai-interpreter-fail-at-china-summit-sparks-debate-about-future-of-profession/ (accessed 04.05.2021) (In English)
Le, Q. V., Schuste, M. (2016) A neural network for machine translation, at production scale. Google Al Blog. [Online]. Available at: https://ai.googleblog.com/2016/09/a-neural-network-for-machine.html (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 566 p. (In English)
Lewis, W. (2020) AI and interpreting. Will Lewis on automated speech translation: Scale, uses & edge cases. YouTube, 13 November. [Online]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KihPeHh0wyo (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
McNair, A., Waibel, A., Jain, A. L. et al. (1991) JANUS: A speech-to-speech translation system using connectionist and symbolic processing strategies. In: ICASSP 91: International conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. Vol. 1. Washington: IEEE Publ., pp. 793−796. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1991.150456 (In English)
Melby, A. K. (1981) Translators and machines — can they cooperate? Meta, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23–34. https://doi.org/10.7202/003619ar (In English)
Melby, A. K. (2002) Memory and translation. Across Languages and Cultures, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45−57. https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.3.2002.1.3 (In English)
Monacelli, C. (2009) Self-preservation in simultaneous interpreting. Surviving the role. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ., 182 p. https://www.doi.org/10.1075/btl.84 (In English)
Moorkens, J. (2018) What to expect from Neural Machine Translation: A practical in-class translation evaluation exercise. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 375−387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2018.1501639 (In English)
Nakamura, S. (2009) Overcoming the language barrier with speech translation technology. Science & Technology Trends — Quarterly Review, no. 31, pp. 36−49. (In English)
Niehues, J. (2020) AI and interpreting. Jan Niehues on automated speech translation: Challenges and approaches. YouTube, 13 November. [Online]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90E9J1zPxlY (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
The Nimdzi Interpreting Index. (2019) Nimdzi. [Online]. Available at: https://www.nimdzi.com/the-2019-nimdzi-interpreting-index/ (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
Pöchhacker, F. (2016) Introducing interpreting studies. 2nd ed. London; New York: Routledge Publ., 280 p. (In English)
Roy, C. (2002) The problem with definitions, descriptions, and the role metaphors of interpreters. In: F. Pöchhacker, M. Shlesinger (eds.). The interpreting studies reader. London; New York: Routledge Publ., pp. 344−354. (In English)
Sager, J. C. (1994) Language engineering and translation: Consequences of automation. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publ., 345 p. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.1 (In English)
Shaw, J. (2019) Artificial intelligence and ethics. Beyond engineering at the dawn of decision-making machines. Harvard Magazine, no. 1, pp. 44−74. [Online]. Available at: https://harvardmagazine.com/sites/default/files/pdf/2019/01-pdfs/0119-44.pdf (accessed 04.05.2021). (In English)
Siau, K., Wang, W. (2020) Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethics: Ethics of AI and ethical AI. Journal of Database Management, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 74−87. http://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2020040105 (In English)
Tate, G., Turner, G. H. (2002) The code and the culture. Sign language interpreting — in search of the new breed’s ethics. In: F. Pöchhacker, M. Shlesinger (eds.). The interpreting studies reader. London; New York: Routledge Publ., pp. 374−383. (In English)
Varga, Á. (2016) Machine translation. In: I. Horváth (ed.). The modern translator and interpreter. Budapest: Eötvös University Press, pp. 153−165. (In English)
Vauquois, B. (1976) Automatic translation — a survey of different approaches. In: H. Karlgren (ed.). SMIL: Statistical methods in linguistics. Stockholm: Sprākförlaget Publ., pp. 127–135. (In English)
Wadensjö, C. (1998) Interpreting as interaction. London; New York: Longman Publ., 312 p. (In English)
Wilss, W. (1993) Basic concepts of MT. Meta, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 403−413. https://doi.org/10.7202/004608ar (In English)
Yule, G. (1996) The study of language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294 p. (In English)
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ildikó Horváth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.
